Capitalizing on Campaign Management = Yikes, We Need More Content!!

One of the greatest demand generation challenges that I have seen with every software company is the company’s ability (or lack thereof) to continuously develop compelling content to support campaigns. In many cases, lack of content is ‘thee’ showstopper.

And now, as more companies invest in campaign management systems such as Oracle, Eloqua, Aprimo, Unica, Market2Lead, etc., (refer to Gartner Magic Quadrant for Multitchannel Campaign Management 2009 for an entire list), many of these companies have the ability to (1) automate campaign generation, (2) better (or in some cases, start to) segment their market(s) and target audience(s) and (3) nurture leads (for the first time!), which will further exasperate the ‘content’ problem.

Consider these “as is” scenarios - before campaign automation.

(1) Before automation, we manually launch all campaigns, however simple or complex.
(2) Before (improved) segmentation/targeting, we don’t segment or we segment at the highest (limited number of) levels (e.g., target IT professionals versus LOB managers).
(3) Before nurturing, we don’t know where a prospect is in the ‘marketing pipeline’ so we treat all prospects equally and throw the same campaigns (and content) to everyone without regard to their interest level.

Consider these “to be” scenarios - after campaign automation.

(1) After automation, we can schedule campaigns to execute automatically, freeing up headcount to work on developing and executing more complex campaigns. By default, we can run more campaigns with the same resources, maybe even less.
(2) After improved segmentation/targeting, we can better profile a prospect by title, industry, interests, behavior, preferences, etc. and execute campaigns that are more specifically tailored to an individual (by grouping or segmenting like-kind prospects). This increases the number of campaigns.
(3) After nurturing, we know where a prospect is in the ‘marketing pipeline’ because we can ‘score leads’ and identify what campaigns/content to provide along the way from prospect first contact thru close (and beyond if we are up selling/cross selling into our existing customer base). Now, we can execute campaigns specific to the target, segment AND lead score, increasing the number of campaigns by another x factor.

Let’s look at an example. Let’s assume we are targeting IT professionals. In the “as is” scenario, we develop a number of campaigns with messaging and content that is the same for every IT professional regardless of industry, title, interest level, etc. In the “to be” scenario, we segment IT professionals in Financial Services/Insurance from IT professionals in the Manufacturing segment or the Health care segment and so on. Instead of a one-size-fits-all message to all IT professionals, we can now tailor each campaign to talk to the strategic issues each IT segment experiences (and hopefully play into how our software product/solutions address those issues). With Financial Services – it may be compliance. With Manufacturing, it may be ERP. With Health, it may be integration and so on.

We can further segment based on 'title' executing campaigns that talk to more operational benefits targeting managers and campaigns that talk to more strategic benefits targeting the VP level. Once we execute lead scoring, we can further segment and develop separate campaigns to first time visitors, xx time visitors, etc. and nurture that lead along.

Yikes! We need more content says the head of the demand generation team and begins dialoguing with Product Management, Product Marketing and outside consultants to line up campaigns and the unique content that is required.

Next post provides some ideas on how we can generate the content we need to support an increasing number of demand generation campaigns….

Some interesting links:

Top Ten Marketing Automation Software Vendors
Set Expectations by Scoring Your Lead

Integrating Social Media Marketing

I had a series of interesting conversations these past few days with several individuals about the importance of integrating traditional marketing techniques with social media marketing. As I work with a series of different B-to-B clients, I notice that one company typically excels at traditional marketing techniques while another excels at social media. Many organizations are looking for the right marketing talent to integrate the best practices of each.

Marketing Sherpa published a good article this past week about Social Medias Place in the Elite Marketing Trio, which you should read to make sense of the remainder of my post. Here is the chart with the results of a survey asking marketers to rank the importance of social media. I voted (unofficially to myself) and chose that in a pure integrated marketing model, social media marketing can (1) complement existing tactics, (2) be a standard marketing tactic and (3) have its own budget line item. The answer for your organization will have something to do with the target audiences and products/services that your team is marketing.

For example, with a company that has multiple products or lines-of-business (LOBs) targeting different segments and/or audiences - you might choose a social media marketing tactic exclusively for one segment and perhaps integrate with existing tactics when targeting another segment/audience. Your choices may be driven by (1) your desired outcomes, (2) where a segmented audience is in the lead nurturing cycle (or the impact on brand as an influencer or thought leader), (3) how 'social' your audience is and (4) your budget and the need to balance and execute more comprehensive marketing tactics (including social media) to your top priority segments/audiences, while spending less dollars via social media exclusively for segments that are a secondary focus.

I think it is also important to note that the "trio" analogy the author discusses talks to interactive marketing tactics and if a non-marketer reads this article, it can leave an impression that oversimplifies the power (and complexity) of marketing. While interactive marketing tactics are important, there is more to marketing/lead generation than dropping emails, SEO and social media particularity for enterprise software companies. Most enterprise software companies have multiple "messages" and target audiences as discussed above. For those organizations targeting C-suite executives and Vice Presidents, in particular, marketers need to integrate an array of different marketing mediums including direct (dimensional) mailings, executive events (such as a breakfast event, cocktail hour, dinner, etc.), email, webinars, SEO/SEM, social media, tradeshows/conferences/thought leadership events, telemarketing, etc. - those that entice more "face-to-face" interaction and relationships.

The good news with this survey is that marketers realize that social media is here to stay. I think it would be interesting to survey non-marketing executives to get their point of view. I sometimes think that all the hype about social media marketing is confusing non-marketers who already grapple with what marketing really is....

Here are some relevant links/sites on this topic:

http://elektrik.com/blog/2009/07/integrated-marketing-strategies-are-even-more-important/

http://masterful-marketing.com/social-media-marketing-one-component-of-marketing-plan/

Part III - Tips on Segmentation, Solution-Selling and Selling Solutions

In order to address segmentation and answer the question: what am I selling to a given vertical that differentiates my product or service from what I sell to another vertical – I find it is good to talk about the concepts of ‘solution-selling’ (or ‘solution selling’) vs. ‘selling solutions.’

I remember working with one enterprise Software Company evangelizing solution-selling as I was working to expand this organizations brand from an infrastructure company to a “solutions” company. Since I had been an early advocate of (and thoroughly trained in) ‘consultative selling’, the notion of solution-selling was natural for me to embrace. I was very surprised about a year into this position when one of the most respected product marketing directors exclaimed: “Terry, when you talk about solution-selling, I thought you were talking about selling applications.” I then realized that I had some work to do to better explain myself.

Even as late as this past year, I’ve been asked the same question or something close to it – “What is solution-selling?”, “What is a solution?”, etc. Some years ago, it was rumored that IBM was asking similar questions and engaged SiriusDecisions to define a “solution”. A white paper on this topic can be found on the SiriusDecisions website (but you may need to have a subscription).

Here are my thoughts on solution-selling, what a solution is, etc.

Solution-selling is different than selling solutions. Typically, when selling solutions, the prospect tends to think you have an “out-of-the-box application” or something quite close to it. Selling an application can incorporate (and should incorporate) solution-selling concepts but solution-selling does not mean you are selling an application…is this confusing?

Solution-selling occurs when you position your marketing and sales message to address a “business pain” that a prospect is experiencing instead of merely selling technology for technology’s sake. In a good economy, such as what we experienced in the late 90’s, your prospect organizations were enamored with technology and were willing to spend big bucks just to have the latest and greatest technology “toys”. In most cases, it was the IT organization that made the buy decisions. When the .com bomb occurred, we saw the pendulum swing away from buying technology for technology’s sake - to the requirement for organizations to invest in technology when a line-of-business (LOB) executive indicated that he/she needed this technology to solve a strategic (or tactical) business problem. The challenge technology vendors had: convince the LOB executives that your technology could address their business pain. Hence, the language of marketing and selling had to change. This is what we call solution-selling.

So, instead of selling features and functions to IT (who could intuitively understand why a given feature/function was important), we had to sell benefits and return-on-investment (ROI) to the LOB executive. Technology vendors had to ‘talk the talk’ of the business executive. If you were selling technology to an insurance company claims vice president, you needed to talk about claims management and processing. If you were selling to a bank’s mortgage department, you had to talk about mortgage servicing and processing.

Since the beginning of time, technology organizations have been working to execute to a solution-selling approach. Even today when I speak to many software organizations, solution-selling is top of mind.

Here are some links to other blogs/articles defining solution-selling which offer similar points of views. There are also many books available that go into detail regarding solution-selling sales methodologies.

http://businessskeptic.firstrulecorp.com/2007/10/13/solution-selling-defined/

http://www.4hoteliers.com/4hots_fshw.php?mwi=3476

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solution_selling

Next posting, I will talk about my views on the evolution from solution-selling to selling solutions…..

Part II - Tips on how SMB Enterprise Software Companies can better segment

This is a 2nd posting on this topic. See posting dated August 12, 2009 for Part I of this series.

'Segmented messaging’ is typically a first “baby step” that many SMB software organizations choose when “going vertical”. The challenge you face is: where do I get the content? The answers are:

(1) Identify company personnel who have specific industry expertise and/or

(2) Hire part time consultants who have the domain expertise you need as an interim step and/or

(3) If you have already defined your longer term roll-out plan for verticalization and plan to move to “segmented marketing”, you may want to consider hiring marketing professionals with domain expertise.

‘Segmented marketing’ means that you plan to target all of your marketing messages directly to a given segment by developing an “integrated marketing” model and I emphasize the word “integrated”. In the past, I have seen organizations move to segmented marketing but in a fragmented way, e.g., run segmented lead generation campaigns but not segment the message in media, public or analyst relations. I have never seen a fragmented marketing model work. In fact, every like-kind approach was an abysmal failure forcing the organization to revert back to the former “horizontal” model. (And typically try a vertical approach again a few years down the road).

Marketing messages need to be consistent. If your PR team is talking a different talk than your lead generation team, you will more than likely waste marketing dollars and never realize an acceptable ROI on segmentation.

‘Segmented sales’ occurs when the sales force is verticalized but this is not an all-or-nothing approach. In fact, in most cases, sales verticalization is localized. Metropolitan areas may realign sales over verticals where there are large concentrations of companies whereas rural geographies might identify multiple verticals or not verticalize at all. In some cases, both sales and pre-sales technical support may be verticalized or just sales. In other cases, (and this is prevalent in initial phases), sales will not be initially verticalized but sales “domain experts” - what we call “rain makers” - work with sales as an “overlay” function.

Unlike segmented marketing where only an integrated approach will work, there are many successful segmented sales models.

Next blog answers your question: Ok…I’m convinced I need to “go vertical” but what product/solution am I selling?